Technologies of humility encourage, firstly, reflection on the framing of risk, which can help avoid exclusion and hidden injustice, such as the consequences of delayed climate action for future generations. In dialogue with these early articulations of a responsible research and innovation agenda, Sheila Jasanoff outlined the need for ‘Technologies of Humility’ or ‘methods, or better yet institutionalized habits of thought, that try to come to grips with … the unknown, the uncertain, the ambiguous, and the uncontrollable’ : 227. This influence is visible even in positive policies, such as the US Inflation Reduction Act 2022. They are actively influencing policies and publics, as highlighted in the BBC documentary ‘Big Oil v the World’ (2022), where Exxon is shown to have suppressed its own research because it linked fossil fuel extraction with global warming. A major driver in this crisis is that proponents of neoliberal ideologies and vested interests in fossil fuel dependency exploit political inertia to sow doubt, rationalise delay, and provide placebo solutions. call it a ‘policy-making tragedy’ where policy-makers become trapped by short-term horizons even when the implications of doing so are catastrophic. For some, the gap between climate commitments and actions is the result of ‘organised hypocrisy’, while Levin et al. Dissensus and uncertainties affect many politicians’ willingness to commit to anything but ambitious goals. Changing mobilities is risky for governance actors, because mobility is an existential need and societal flashpoint.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |